Maybe some lightning bolts should be worked into my title. You think you’ll have a Eureka moment when you read the news, but instead, you end up frizzling your brains on their magic bus.
I’m generally like a moth to flame regarding absurdist article titles like this: Study receives $3.3 million grant to address COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy among people with anxiety or depression. What kind of Suzy Do-gooders are the new generation of scientists, anyway*? But maybe it has more to do with feeling relevant when there’s a several million dollar pricetag attached to your research. The article went on to discuss how they would use weakened forms of disinformation to inoculate doubters against — I guess? — strong disinformation:
“The intervention will work the way some vaccines work: by exposing people to weakened forms of mis/disinformation, which can strengthen their ability to identify and resist mis/disinformation when they encounter it in the future.”
After this quote, the article listed several articles titles, and I genuinely thought they were providing examples of weak disinformation:
Of course, I did notice after a few moments’ contemplation that these were other articles on their site. That is to say, they weren’t provided as examples. They all sound too hard to believe, though, and I suspect that’s what’s meant by “weak disinformation.” The last article might have some validity, as long as it properly defines “overly processed foods.” Most food we eat is processed in one way or other; that’s what sets us apart from animals. Cheese, for example. Cheese is a highly processed food. Or maybe some weak disinformation is disseminated through ambiguous language, which would put the last article back squarely in the camp. I mean, I don’t know what they mean. For millions of dollars, I hope they do. And good luck learning anything from this article on what constitutes weak disinfo, as it’s mostly gibberish, almost impossible to comprehend — itself an example of weak disinformation?
Funny thing, as I spent my Friday night watching videos of Jose Torres El Rey de Alto Mando (accordion player), I realized I could learn as much from him about health as from science articles. He’s an accordion player, and he posts recipes of health elixirs. He also seems to enjoy helping and encouraging people, which is very important for mental health and the world in general*. Unlike many pasty-faced doctors, he looks fairly healthy. And if you want a good laugh, watch his La muchacha interesada video. Millennial-style cumbia? I honestly don’t know; maybe they are Zoomers. I don’t know where these arbitrary lines are anymore, but they do look young to my eyes.
Yes, I can bring everything back to the accordion. Just wait and see.
*The difference between do-gooders and normal people who help others is actually quite large. Do-gooders are controlling of and diminishing towards others’ humanity; the others are not.